Mobile, AL: 2-bedroom payment standards across 48 ZIP codes
HUD's FY2026 Small Area Fair Market Rents for Mobile, AL MSA range from $900 to $1,480 for a 2-bedroom. The 90th-percentile ZIP code runs 1.34× the 10th — a gap of $312 a month — which ranks 143th widest of the 247 HUD metro areas we compare.
median 2-bedroom SAFMR across the area's 48 ZIP codes. Each ZIP code carries its own standard here; your PHA sets a figure within 90–110% of that ZIP's SAFMR.
monthly gap between the 90th- and 10th-percentile ZIP code ($928 to $1,240).
of the area's ZIP codes (8 of 48) sit above $1,188 — 110% of the area median. Because ZIP-level standards are required here, that is a measure of the area's rent spread, not of ZIP codes left behind by a ceiling.
Highest-rent ZIP codes in Mobile, AL
Every ZIP code, ranked
The payment-standard column is HUD's published 90–110% band for that ZIP code — the range a housing authority may adopt without HUD approval. Your PHA sets the exact figure. The final column compares each ZIP to the area median; ZIP codes marked above 110% exceed 110% of that median, which here simply marks the top of the area's rent range — ZIP-level standards are required in this area, so no ZIP is capped by an area-wide figure.
| # | ZIP code | 2 BR SAFMR ▾ | Payment standard (90–110%) | vs area median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 36528 | $1,480 | $1,332–$1,628 | above 110% |
| 2 | 36505 | $1,440 | $1,296–$1,584 | above 110% |
| 3 | 36572 | $1,330 | $1,197–$1,463 | above 110% |
| 4 | 36695 | $1,270 | $1,143–$1,397 | above 110% |
| 5 | 36608 | $1,240 | $1,116–$1,364 | above 110% |
| 6 | 36688 | $1,240 | $1,116–$1,364 | above 110% |
| 7 | 36613 | $1,230 | $1,107–$1,353 | above 110% |
| 8 | 36618 | $1,190 | $1,071–$1,309 | above 110% |
| 9 | 36512 | $1,180 | $1,062–$1,298 | 109% |
| 10 | 36575 | $1,150 | $1,035–$1,265 | 106% |
| 11 | 36617 | $1,140 | $1,026–$1,254 | 106% |
| 12 | 36693 | $1,140 | $1,026–$1,254 | 106% |
| 13 | 36619 | $1,130 | $1,017–$1,243 | 105% |
| 14 | 36523 | $1,120 | $1,008–$1,232 | 104% |
| 15 | 36605 | $1,100 | $990–$1,210 | 102% |
| 16 | 36609 | $1,090 | $981–$1,199 | 101% |
| 17 | 36541 | $1,080 | $972–$1,188 | 100% |
| 18 | 36571 | $1,080 | $972–$1,188 | 100% |
| 19 | 36590 | $1,080 | $972–$1,188 | 100% |
| 20 | 36601 | $1,080 | $972–$1,188 | 100% |
| 21 | 36615 | $1,080 | $972–$1,188 | 100% |
| 22 | 36616 | $1,080 | $972–$1,188 | 100% |
| 23 | 36633 | $1,080 | $972–$1,188 | 100% |
| 24 | 36640 | $1,080 | $972–$1,188 | 100% |
| 25 | 36660 | $1,080 | $972–$1,188 | 100% |
| 26 | 36670 | $1,080 | $972–$1,188 | 100% |
| 27 | 36671 | $1,080 | $972–$1,188 | 100% |
| 28 | 36685 | $1,080 | $972–$1,188 | 100% |
| 29 | 36689 | $1,080 | $972–$1,188 | 100% |
| 30 | 36691 | $1,080 | $972–$1,188 | 100% |
| 31 | 36607 | $1,050 | $945–$1,155 | 97% |
| 32 | 36611 | $1,040 | $936–$1,144 | 96% |
| 33 | 36652 | $1,040 | $936–$1,144 | 96% |
| 34 | 36525 | $1,020 | $918–$1,122 | 94% |
| 35 | 36602 | $1,020 | $918–$1,122 | 94% |
| 36 | 36606 | $1,020 | $918–$1,122 | 94% |
| 37 | 36560 | $1,000 | $900–$1,100 | 93% |
| 38 | 36568 | $1,000 | $900–$1,100 | 93% |
| 39 | 36587 | $990 | $891–$1,089 | 92% |
| 40 | 36663 | $980 | $882–$1,078 | 91% |
| 41 | 36582 | $960 | $864–$1,056 | 89% |
| 42 | 36604 | $950 | $855–$1,045 | 88% |
| 43 | 36521 | $940 | $846–$1,034 | 87% |
| 44 | 36509 | $900 | $810–$990 | 83% |
| 45 | 36544 | $900 | $810–$990 | 83% |
| 46 | 36603 | $900 | $810–$990 | 83% |
| 47 | 36610 | $900 | $810–$990 | 83% |
| 48 | 36612 | $900 | $810–$990 | 83% |
How Mobile, AL compares
Its internal spread of 1.34× (p90 ÷ p10) ranks 143 of 247 HUD metro FMR areas, against a median of 1.37× and a national high of 1.77×. On the steadier p75 ÷ p25 measure it is 1.12×. See the full ranking and how it was measured →
A note on what this does not mean: a higher payment standard does not increase the assistance a household receives. It raises the ceiling on the rent a voucher can cover, while the household still pays roughly 30% of adjusted income. Figures are ZIP-weighted, not renter-weighted, and rest on 2019–2023 American Community Survey data trended forward.