Jackson, MS: 2-bedroom payment standards across 51 ZIP codes
HUD's FY2026 Small Area Fair Market Rents for Jackson, MS HUD Metro FMR Area range from $840 to $1,930 for a 2-bedroom. The 90th-percentile ZIP code runs 1.45× the 10th — a gap of $450 a month — which ranks 81th widest of the 247 HUD metro areas we compare.
median 2-bedroom SAFMR across the area's 51 ZIP codes. Each ZIP code carries its own standard here; your PHA sets a figure within 90–110% of that ZIP's SAFMR.
monthly gap between the 90th- and 10th-percentile ZIP code ($1,010 to $1,460).
of the area's ZIP codes (13 of 51) sit above $1,375 — 110% of the area median. Because ZIP-level standards are required here, that is a measure of the area's rent spread, not of ZIP codes left behind by a ceiling.
Highest-rent ZIP codes in Jackson, MS
Every ZIP code, ranked
The payment-standard column is HUD's published 90–110% band for that ZIP code — the range a housing authority may adopt without HUD approval. Your PHA sets the exact figure. The final column compares each ZIP to the area median; ZIP codes marked above 110% exceed 110% of that median, which here simply marks the top of the area's rent range — ZIP-level standards are required in this area, so no ZIP is capped by an area-wide figure.
| # | ZIP code | 2 BR SAFMR ▾ | Payment standard (90–110%) | vs area median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 39110 | $1,930 | $1,737–$2,123 | above 110% |
| 2 | 39047 | $1,830 | $1,647–$2,013 | above 110% |
| 3 | 39232 | $1,700 | $1,530–$1,870 | above 110% |
| 4 | 39272 | $1,590 | $1,431–$1,749 | above 110% |
| 5 | 39201 | $1,570 | $1,413–$1,727 | above 110% |
| 6 | 39211 | $1,460 | $1,314–$1,606 | above 110% |
| 7 | 39043 | $1,450 | $1,305–$1,595 | above 110% |
| 8 | 39167 | $1,450 | $1,305–$1,595 | above 110% |
| 9 | 39288 | $1,450 | $1,305–$1,595 | above 110% |
| 10 | 39298 | $1,450 | $1,305–$1,595 | above 110% |
| 11 | 39157 | $1,440 | $1,296–$1,584 | above 110% |
| 12 | 39056 | $1,400 | $1,260–$1,540 | above 110% |
| 13 | 39058 | $1,400 | $1,260–$1,540 | above 110% |
| 14 | 39216 | $1,360 | $1,224–$1,496 | 109% |
| 15 | 39193 | $1,350 | $1,215–$1,485 | 108% |
| 16 | 39208 | $1,350 | $1,215–$1,485 | 108% |
| 17 | 39212 | $1,350 | $1,215–$1,485 | 108% |
| 18 | 39218 | $1,340 | $1,206–$1,474 | 107% |
| 19 | 39154 | $1,330 | $1,197–$1,463 | 106% |
| 20 | 39130 | $1,300 | $1,170–$1,430 | 104% |
| 21 | 39158 | $1,300 | $1,170–$1,430 | 104% |
| 22 | 39206 | $1,280 | $1,152–$1,408 | 102% |
| 23 | 39060 | $1,250 | $1,125–$1,375 | 100% |
| 24 | 39205 | $1,250 | $1,125–$1,375 | 100% |
| 25 | 39207 | $1,250 | $1,125–$1,375 | 100% |
| 26 | 39215 | $1,250 | $1,125–$1,375 | 100% |
| 27 | 39225 | $1,250 | $1,125–$1,375 | 100% |
| 28 | 39236 | $1,250 | $1,125–$1,375 | 100% |
| 29 | 39269 | $1,250 | $1,125–$1,375 | 100% |
| 30 | 39282 | $1,250 | $1,125–$1,375 | 100% |
| 31 | 39283 | $1,250 | $1,125–$1,375 | 100% |
| 32 | 39284 | $1,250 | $1,125–$1,375 | 100% |
| 33 | 39286 | $1,250 | $1,125–$1,375 | 100% |
| 34 | 39289 | $1,250 | $1,125–$1,375 | 100% |
| 35 | 39296 | $1,250 | $1,125–$1,375 | 100% |
| 36 | 39071 | $1,190 | $1,071–$1,309 | 95% |
| 37 | 39170 | $1,160 | $1,044–$1,276 | 93% |
| 38 | 39209 | $1,150 | $1,035–$1,265 | 92% |
| 39 | 39148 | $1,140 | $1,026–$1,254 | 91% |
| 40 | 39210 | $1,130 | $1,017–$1,243 | 90% |
| 41 | 39202 | $1,090 | $981–$1,199 | 87% |
| 42 | 39046 | $1,080 | $972–$1,188 | 86% |
| 43 | 39204 | $1,080 | $972–$1,188 | 86% |
| 44 | 39174 | $1,060 | $954–$1,166 | 85% |
| 45 | 39066 | $1,030 | $927–$1,133 | 82% |
| 46 | 39045 | $1,010 | $909–$1,111 | 81% |
| 47 | 39213 | $990 | $891–$1,089 | 79% |
| 48 | 39217 | $940 | $846–$1,034 | 75% |
| 49 | 39203 | $890 | $801–$979 | 71% |
| 50 | 39059 | $860 | $774–$946 | 69% |
| 51 | 39041 | $840 | $756–$924 | 67% |
How Jackson, MS compares
Its internal spread of 1.45× (p90 ÷ p10) ranks 81 of 247 HUD metro FMR areas, against a median of 1.37× and a national high of 1.77×. On the steadier p75 ÷ p25 measure it is 1.21×. See the full ranking and how it was measured →
A note on what this does not mean: a higher payment standard does not increase the assistance a household receives. It raises the ceiling on the rent a voucher can cover, while the household still pays roughly 30% of adjusted income. Figures are ZIP-weighted, not renter-weighted, and rest on 2019–2023 American Community Survey data trended forward.