Charleston-North Charleston, SC: 2-bedroom payment standards across 53 ZIP codes
HUD's FY2026 Small Area Fair Market Rents for Charleston-North Charleston, SC MSA range from $1,300 to $2,680 for a 2-bedroom. The 90th-percentile ZIP code runs 1.77× the 10th — a gap of $1,006 a month — which ranks 1st widest of the 247 HUD metro areas we compare.
median 2-bedroom SAFMR across the area's 53 ZIP codes. Each ZIP code carries its own standard here; your PHA sets a figure within 90–110% of that ZIP's SAFMR.
monthly gap between the 90th- and 10th-percentile ZIP code ($1,304 to $2,310).
of the area's ZIP codes (15 of 53) sit above $2,002 — 110% of the area median. Because ZIP-level standards are required here, that is a measure of the area's rent spread, not of ZIP codes left behind by a ceiling.
Highest-rent ZIP codes in Charleston-North Charleston, SC
Every ZIP code, ranked
The payment-standard column is HUD's published 90–110% band for that ZIP code — the range a housing authority may adopt without HUD approval. Your PHA sets the exact figure. The final column compares each ZIP to the area median; ZIP codes marked above 110% exceed 110% of that median, which here simply marks the top of the area's rent range — ZIP-level standards are required in this area, so no ZIP is capped by an area-wide figure.
| # | ZIP code | 2 BR SAFMR ▾ | Payment standard (90–110%) | vs area median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 29451 | $2,680 | $2,412–$2,948 | above 110% |
| 2 | 29466 | $2,540 | $2,286–$2,794 | above 110% |
| 3 | 29482 | $2,540 | $2,286–$2,794 | above 110% |
| 4 | 29439 | $2,530 | $2,277–$2,783 | above 110% |
| 5 | 29464 | $2,530 | $2,277–$2,783 | above 110% |
| 6 | 29401 | $2,320 | $2,088–$2,552 | above 110% |
| 7 | 29424 | $2,270 | $2,043–$2,497 | above 110% |
| 8 | 29492 | $2,250 | $2,025–$2,475 | above 110% |
| 9 | 29403 | $2,190 | $1,971–$2,409 | above 110% |
| 10 | 29409 | $2,190 | $1,971–$2,409 | above 110% |
| 11 | 29404 | $2,160 | $1,944–$2,376 | above 110% |
| 12 | 29412 | $2,130 | $1,917–$2,343 | above 110% |
| 13 | 29458 | $2,130 | $1,917–$2,343 | above 110% |
| 14 | 29414 | $2,110 | $1,899–$2,321 | above 110% |
| 15 | 29429 | $2,080 | $1,872–$2,288 | above 110% |
| 16 | 29407 | $1,880 | $1,692–$2,068 | 103% |
| 17 | 29486 | $1,850 | $1,665–$2,035 | 102% |
| 18 | 29402 | $1,820 | $1,638–$2,002 | 100% |
| 19 | 29413 | $1,820 | $1,638–$2,002 | 100% |
| 20 | 29415 | $1,820 | $1,638–$2,002 | 100% |
| 21 | 29416 | $1,820 | $1,638–$2,002 | 100% |
| 22 | 29417 | $1,820 | $1,638–$2,002 | 100% |
| 23 | 29419 | $1,820 | $1,638–$2,002 | 100% |
| 24 | 29422 | $1,820 | $1,638–$2,002 | 100% |
| 25 | 29423 | $1,820 | $1,638–$2,002 | 100% |
| 26 | 29425 | $1,820 | $1,638–$2,002 | 100% |
| 27 | 29457 | $1,820 | $1,638–$2,002 | 100% |
| 28 | 29465 | $1,820 | $1,638–$2,002 | 100% |
| 29 | 29450 | $1,810 | $1,629–$1,991 | 99% |
| 30 | 29455 | $1,800 | $1,620–$1,980 | 99% |
| 31 | 29420 | $1,790 | $1,611–$1,969 | 98% |
| 32 | 29456 | $1,780 | $1,602–$1,958 | 98% |
| 33 | 29445 | $1,770 | $1,593–$1,947 | 97% |
| 34 | 29485 | $1,760 | $1,584–$1,936 | 97% |
| 35 | 29406 | $1,690 | $1,521–$1,859 | 93% |
| 36 | 29487 | $1,690 | $1,521–$1,859 | 93% |
| 37 | 29410 | $1,660 | $1,494–$1,826 | 91% |
| 38 | 29484 | $1,650 | $1,485–$1,815 | 91% |
| 39 | 29418 | $1,560 | $1,404–$1,716 | 86% |
| 40 | 29405 | $1,540 | $1,386–$1,694 | 85% |
| 41 | 29426 | $1,520 | $1,368–$1,672 | 84% |
| 42 | 29483 | $1,510 | $1,359–$1,661 | 83% |
| 43 | 29461 | $1,460 | $1,314–$1,606 | 80% |
| 44 | 29453 | $1,430 | $1,287–$1,573 | 79% |
| 45 | 29434 | $1,410 | $1,269–$1,551 | 77% |
| 46 | 29469 | $1,350 | $1,215–$1,485 | 74% |
| 47 | 29431 | $1,320 | $1,188–$1,452 | 73% |
| 48 | 29437 | $1,300 | $1,170–$1,430 | 71% |
| 49 | 29448 | $1,300 | $1,170–$1,430 | 71% |
| 50 | 29449 | $1,300 | $1,170–$1,430 | 71% |
| 51 | 29468 | $1,300 | $1,170–$1,430 | 71% |
| 52 | 29470 | $1,300 | $1,170–$1,430 | 71% |
| 53 | 29479 | $1,300 | $1,170–$1,430 | 71% |
How Charleston-North Charleston, SC compares
Its internal spread of 1.77× (p90 ÷ p10) ranks 1 of 247 HUD metro FMR areas, against a median of 1.37× and a national high of 1.77×. On the steadier p75 ÷ p25 measure it is 1.37×. See the full ranking and how it was measured →
A note on what this does not mean: a higher payment standard does not increase the assistance a household receives. It raises the ceiling on the rent a voucher can cover, while the household still pays roughly 30% of adjusted income. Figures are ZIP-weighted, not renter-weighted, and rest on 2019–2023 American Community Survey data trended forward.